ASP.NET MVC 3 RTM

Rating:        Based on 20 ratings
Reviewed:  7 reviews
Downloads: 71803
Released: Jan 7, 2011
Updated: Sep 14, 2011 by jsgoupil
Dev status: Stable Help Icon

Recommended Download

Application ASP.NET MVC 3 RTM Source Code
application, 2555K, uploaded Jan 8, 2011 - 53017 downloads

Other Available Downloads

Application ASP.NET MVC 3 Futures
application, 200K, uploaded Feb 24, 2011 - 18786 downloads

Release Notes

This release contains the source code for ASP.NET MVC 3 RTM as well as the ASP.NET MVC Futures project. The futures project contains features that the ASP.NET MVC team is considering for a future release of ASP.NET MVC.

The MS-PL distribution of the source code can be downloaded here.

This release contains the source code for
  • ASP.NET MVC 3 RTM
  • ASP.NET Web Pages with Razor Syntax
  • ASP.NET MVC 3 Futures

For more details about ASP.NET MVC 3, please visit http://asp.net/mvc/mvc3 as well as the Release Notes

Reviews for this release

     
is what I want to learn
by yemeishu on May 6, 2012 at 11:13 AM
     
Been working long time with web frameworks. this one is just ...astonishing. Good for beginners and professionals!
by humbrie on Dec 16, 2011 at 10:06 AM
     
Awesome one, though I have one question - why so many unit tests failed to pass? :)
by chester89 on Dec 9, 2011 at 9:30 AM
     
Maybe I detect a bug. I tried to integrate a WCF REST service to a MVC project like follow code: RouteTable.Routes.Add(new ServiceRoute("Uap", new WebServiceHostFactory(), typeof(Service.UapService))); The ActionLink() function returned a wrong url like follow : http://localhost:3315/Uap?action=Index&controller=Application
by wzd24 on May 29, 2011 at 3:47 PM
     
The best FW ever.
by Skorunka on Apr 7, 2011 at 12:27 PM
     
Suggestion: Will it converge with WCF? I mean MVC and WCF have some similitudes: able to work on HTTP, support routing, etc. It can be nice if a WCF can return a MVC Razor view. So from a WCF you can manage everything, any web servie, and any html page.
by Nekketsu on Apr 6, 2011 at 10:54 AM
     
very very good
by wqjqrgtgr on Jan 27, 2011 at 6:17 AM